4.7 Article

Centennial-scale reductions in nitrogen availability in temperate forests of the United States

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08170-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1455894, EF-1241930]
  2. Kansas State University (Academic Excellence Fund)
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX12AK17G]
  4. West Virginia University PSCoR grant program
  5. West Virginia University ARTS grant program
  6. United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research Service [SA6980]
  7. Harvard Forest
  8. Emerging Frontiers
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1455894] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forests cover 30% of the terrestrial Earth surface and are a major component of the global carbon (C) cycle. Humans have doubled the amount of global reactive nitrogen (N), increasing deposition of N onto forests worldwide. However, other global changes-especially climate change and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations-are increasing demand for N, the element limiting primary productivity in temperate forests, which could be reducing N availability. To determine the long-term, integrated effects of global changes on forest N cycling, we measured stable N isotopes in wood, a proxy for N supply relative to demand, on large spatial and temporal scales across the continental U.S.A. Here, we show that forest N availability has generally declined across much of the U.S. since at least 1850 C.E. with cool, wet forests demonstrating the greatest declines. Across sites, recent trajectories of N availability were independent of recent atmospheric N deposition rates, implying a minor role for modern N deposition on the trajectory of N status of North American forests. Our results demonstrate that current trends of global changes are likely to be consistent with forest oligotrophication into the foreseeable future, further constraining forest C fixation and potentially storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据