4.7 Article

An experimental study of different curing regimes on the mechanical properties and sorptivity of self-compacting mortars with fly ash and silica fume

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 552-562

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.228

关键词

Self-compacting mortar; Silica fume; Fly ash; Curing conditions; Fresh properties; Mechanical properties; Sorptivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to investigate the effect of four different curing regimes namely; tap water curing (WC), wet sack curing (WSC), air curing (AC), and liquid paraffin wax curing (LPWC) and different curing times (3, 7, 28, 56 and 180 days) on the mechanical properties of self-compacting Mortars (SCMs). Binary mixtures of SCMs were prepared by replacing Portland cement with 10%, 20%, and 30% by weight of C class fly ash (FA) and 6%, 10%, 14% by weight of silica fume (SF). In ternary mixes, provided that mineral additive ratio doesn't exceed 30% of cement, 10% of FA with 6%, %10, % 14 of SF and %20 of FA with %6, %10 of SF were produced. The water-to-binder (w/b) ratio ranges from 037 to 0.48. A sum of 12 different mixtures with 6301 kg/m(3) binder were prepared to observe SCMs behaviour in fresh and hardened conditions. Mini slump flow diameter, viscosity and mini V-funnel flow time tests were performed to assess the fresh properties of SCMs containing FA and SF. Sorptivity tests were performed on cube specimens with the dimensions of 50 x 50 x 50 mm. Compressive and flexural tensile strengths of the hardened mortars were measured at 3, 7, 28, 56 and 180 days at different curing conditions. The best results for compressive strength at the end of 180 d were determined with 10% FA in binary combination at water curing and with %10FA + %6SF in ternary combination at wet sack curing. The best results for flexural strength at the end of 180 d were determined with control samples at LPWC curing and with %10 SF in binary combination at LPWC. SF10 has the lowest sorptivity coefficient with w/b ratio of 0.40. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据