4.7 Article

miR-875-5p counteracts epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and enhances radiation response in prostate cancer through repression of the EGFR-ZEB1 axis

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 53-62

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.02.033

关键词

microRNAs; Prostate cancer; Radiosensitivity; EMT; EGFR

类别

资金

  1. I. Monzino Foundation
  2. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [ED12162]
  3. AIRC [MFAG11542, IG15191]
  4. AIRC fellowship [16360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment choices for non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), although development of radioresistance limits its effectiveness. Mounting evidence supports the ability of microRNAs to interfere with different radioresistance-associated pathways, suggesting their potential as radiosensitizers. Here, we demonstrate that reconstitution of miR-875-5p, whose expression is down regulated in PCa clinical samples and directly correlates with that of E-cadherin, was able to enhance radiation response in PCa cell lines and xenografts through EGFR direct targeting. Consistent with the established role of EGFR in sustaining epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and promoting DNA repair following radiation-induced nuclear translocation, we found that miR-875-5p reconstitution in PCa cells counteracted EMT and impaired DNA lesion clearance. Down-regulation of the EMT-inducing transcription factor ZEB1, which also plays a role in homologous recombination-mediated repair of DNA lesions by regulating CHK1 expression, was found to be a major determinant of miR-875-5p-induced radiosensitization, as confirmed by phenocopy experiments showing that siRNA-mediated ZEB1 knockdown was able to reproduce the microRNA radiosensitizing effect. Overall, our data support the clinical interest in developing a novel therapeutic approach based on miR-875-5p reconstitution to increase PCa response to radiotherapy. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据