4.7 Article

Aberrant perfusion and its connectivity within default mode network of first-episode drug-naive schizophrenia patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14343-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571651]
  2. State Scholarship Fund
  3. China Scholarship Council [201603170143]
  4. National Key Basic Research and Development Program (973) [2011CB707805]
  5. Fund for the Dissertation Submitted to Fourth Military Medical University for the Academic Degree of Doctor [2014D07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neural substrates behind schizophrenia (SZ) and its heritability mediated by brain function are largely unknown. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), as a biomarker of activation in the brain, reflects the neuronal metabolism, and is promisingly used to detect cerebral alteration thereby shedding light on the features of individuals at high genetic risk. We performed a cross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study enrolling 45 first-episode drug-naive patients with SZ, 32 unaffected first-degree relatives of these patients, and 51 healthy controls (HCs). We examined CBF, CBF connectivity, and CBF topological properties. SZ patients showed increased CBF in the left medial superior frontal gyrus and right precuneus compared with HCs, and decreased CBF in the left middle temporal gyrus compared with their relatives. Furthermore, unaffected relatives revealed higher level of CBF pronounced in regions within default mode network (DMN). Both SZ patients and their relatives exhibited dysconnectivity patterns. Notably, as for the network properties, unaffected relatives were with an intermediate level between SZ patients and HCs in the local efficiency and global efficiency. Our findings demonstrate the aberrant CBF of areas within DMN and the CBF connectivity pattern might be a familial feature in the brain of first-episode SZ patients and their relatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据