4.6 Article

Will your paper be used in a meta-analysis? Make the reach of your research broader and longer lasting

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 777-784

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12758

关键词

data reporting; meta-analysis; open science; quantitative review; reproducibility; research synthesis; transparency

类别

资金

  1. National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) from National Science Foundation [DBI-1052875]
  2. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
  3. Synthesis Centre (sDiv) of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DFG) [FZT 118]
  4. Helmholtz Association (Research School ESCALATE) [VH-KO-613]
  5. Germany Federal Ministry of Education and Research (GLUES) [01LL0901A]
  6. National Science Foundation [1119891]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1262402, 1052875] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1262545, 1639145] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Environmental Biology
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1119891] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Ecological and evolutionary research increasingly uses quantitative synthesis of primary research studies (meta-analysis) for answering fundamental questions, informing environmental policy and summarizing results for decision makers. 2. Knowing how meta-analysis works is important for researchers so that their research can have broader impact. Meta-analytic thinking encourages scientists to see single primary research studies as substantial contributions to a larger picture. 3. To facilitate inclusion in a meta-analysis, relevant primary research studies must be found and basic information about the methods and results must be thoroughly, clearly and transparently reported. While many published papers provide this information, it is common for essential data to be omitted, leading to study exclusion from meta-analyses. 4. We provide guidelines for correctly reporting basic data needed from primary studies in ecology and evolutionary biology so that they can be included in meta-analyses, together with examples that show how data should be reported to enable calculation and analysis of effect sizes, and how data should be made accessible. 5. These guidelines are important for reporting research results in general, whether or not results are included in subsequent meta-analyses, because they are necessary for the interpretation and assessment of study outcomes. Increased implementation of these guidelines by authors, editors and publishers, and reinforcement by funders, will foster higher quality and more inclusive syntheses, further the goals of transparency and reproducibility in science, and improve the quality and value of primary research studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据