4.7 Article

Thy-1+ Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Adversely Impact Lung Cancer Prognosis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06922-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [2R01CA125123-09]
  2. MD Anderson's Institutional Tissue Bank Award [2P30CA016672]
  3. University of Texas Lung Specialized Programs of Research Excellence grant [P50CA70907]
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP120713 C2, RP120713 P1]
  5. Department of Defense PROSPECT grant [W81XWH-07-1-0306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) regulate diverse intratumoral biological programs and can promote or inhibit tumorigenesis, but those CAF populations that negatively impact the clinical outcome of lung cancer patients have not been fully elucidated. Because Thy-1 (CD90) marks CAFs that promote tumor cell invasion in a murine model of Kras(G12D)-driven lung adenocarcinoma (Kras(LA1)), here we postulated that human lung adenocarcinomas containing Thy-1(+) CAFs have a worse prognosis. We first examined the location of Thy-1(+) CAFs within human lung adenocarcinomas. Cells that co-express Thy-1 and a-smooth muscle actin (alpha SMA), a CAF marker, were located on the tumor periphery surrounding collectively invading tumor cells and in perivascular regions. To interrogate a human lung cancer database for the presence of Thy-1(+) CAFs, we isolated Thy-1(+) CAFs and normal lung fibroblasts (LFs) from the lungs of Kras(LA1) mice and wild-type littermates, respectively, and performed global proteomic analysis on the murine CAFs and LFs, which identified 425 proteins that were differentially expressed. Used as a probe to identify Thy-1(+) CAF-enriched tumors in a compendium of 1,586 lung adenocarcinomas, the presence of the 425-gene signature predicted a significantly shorter survival. Thus, Thy-1 marks a CAF population that adversely impacts clinical outcome in human lung cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据