4.7 Article

PI3K p85α Subunit-deficient Macrophages Protect Mice from Acute Colitis due to the Enhancement of IL-10 Production

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06464-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [JP15K18873, JP25460891, JP16H05276, JP16K15408]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Tamura Science Foundation
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05276, 15K18873, 16K15408] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the role of the PI3K p85 alpha subunit in the development of acute colitis with a focus on intestinal macrophages. Experimental acute colitis was induced using 3% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water for 7 days. The severity of DSS-induced acute colitis was significantly attenuated in p85 alpha hetero-deficient (p85 alpha+/-) mice compared with WT mice. The expression of proinflammatory mediators in intestinal macrophages isolated from the inflamed colonic mucosa was significantly suppressed in p85 alpha+/-colitis mice compared with WT colitis mice. Interestingly, we found that bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from p85 alpha+/-mice produced a significantly higher amount of IL-10 than BMDMs from WT mice. The adoptive transfer of p85 alpha+/-BMDMs, but not WT BMDMs, significantly improved the severity in WT colitis mice, and this effect was reversed by anti-IL-10 antibody. Furthermore, the expression of IL-10 in the intestinal macrophages of p85 alpha+/-normal colonic mucosa was significantly higher than that in the intestinal macrophages of WT normal colonic mucosa. The present results demonstrate that p85 alpha+/-mice exhibit a reduced susceptibility to DSS-induced acute colitis. Our study suggests that a deficiency of PI3K p85 alpha enhances the production of IL-10 in intestinal macrophages, thereby suppressing the development of DSS-induced acute colitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据