4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Wetland mapping by fusing fine spatial and hyperspectral resolution images

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 95-106

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.01.004

关键词

Wetland coverage; Spatial-hyperspectral fusion; Classification; China HJ-1A CCD/HSI

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China under the National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0600104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite efforts and progress have been made in wetland mapping using multi-source remotely sensed data, a fine spatial and spectral resolution dynamic modeling of wetland coverage is limited. This research proposed a fusion model to generate fine-spatial-spectral-resolution images by blending multispectral images with fine spatial resolution and hyperspectral images with coarse spatial resolution. Applying the China Environment 1A series satellite (HJ-1A) CCD/HSI data, we showed that the proposed model produced reliable dataset that was not only able to capture spectral fidelity, but also could preserve spatial details. By integrating both fine spatial details and hyperspectral signatures, we further conducted a guided filtering based spectral-spatial mapping on the Poyang Lake wetland. Compared with the classification result of the CCD image, a significant higher classification accuracy of the synthetic fused image was achieved. Results also showed that the final guided-filtering based mapping result could remove potential misclassification biases and achieve higher accuracy than previous pixelwise classification methods Our study.indicated a straightforward approach to blend multi-source remotely sensed data to generate reliable, high-quality dynamic dataset for wetland mapping and ecological modelling. The synthetic combination of spatial and hyperspectral details could improve our understanding of the significance of wetland ecosystem. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据