4.2 Article

Analyzing Dyadic Data With Multilevel Modeling Versus Structural Equation Modeling: A Tale of Two Methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 442-452

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/fam0000290

关键词

multilevel modeling; structural equation modeling; dyadic data analysis; actor-partner interdependence model; dyadic growth curve model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multilevel modeling (MLM) and structural equation modeling (SEM) are the dominant methods for the analysis of dyadic data. Both methods are extensively reviewed for the widely used actor-partner interdependence model and the dyadic growth curve model, as well as other less frequently adopted models, including the common fate model and the mutual influence model. For each method, we discuss the analysis of distinguishable and indistinguishable members, the treatment of missing data, the standardization of effects, and tests of mediation. Even though there has been some blending of the 2 methods, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, thus both should be in the toolbox of dyadic researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据