4.7 Article

Evaluation of α-synuclein as a novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarker in different forms of prion diseases

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 710-719

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.013

关键词

Cerebrospinal fluid; alpha-Synuclein; Biomarker; ELISA; Neurodegenerative diseases; Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Prion diseases

资金

  1. European Commission [222887, FP7-KBBE-2007-2A]
  2. Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND-DEMTEST: Biomarker based diagnosis of rapidly progressive dementias-optimization of diagnostic protocols) grant [01ED1201A]
  3. Alzheimer-Forschungs-Initiative e.V. [AFI 12851]
  4. DZNE-MiGAP study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Accurate diagnosis of prion diseases and discrimination from alternative dementias gain importance in the clinical routine, but partial overlap in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers impedes absolute discrimination in the differential diagnostic context. Methods: We established the clinical parameters for prion disease diagnosis for the quantification of CSF alpha-synuclein in patients with sporadic (n = 234) and genetic (n = 56) prion diseases, in cases with cognitive impairment/dementia or neurodegenerative disease (n = 278), and in the neurologic control group (n = 111). Results: An optimal cutoff value of 680 pg/ mL alpha-synuclein results in 94% sensitivity and 96% specificity when diagnosing sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). Genetic CJD cases showed increased CSF alpha-synuclein values. No increased alpha-synuclein levels were detected in non-CJD cases with rapid progression course. Discussion: Detection of alpha-synuclein in the CSF of patients with suspected CJD is a valuable diagnostic test reaching almost full discrimination from non-prion disease cases. These data highlight the utility of CSF alpha-synuclein quantification in front of classical CSF biomarkers in clinical routine. (C) 2016 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据