4.7 Article

Synthesis, radiolabeling and evaluation of novel 4-oxo-quinoline derivatives as PET tracers for imaging cannabinoid type 2 receptor

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 554-564

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.028

关键词

Cannabinoid receptor type 2; Neuroinflammation; Radio labeling; Autoradiography; Positron emission tomography

资金

  1. Swiss ALS Foundation [2-70664-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our goal is to develop a highly specific and selective PET brain tracer for imaging CB2 expression in patients with neuroinflammatory diseases. Based on our previous findings on a carbon-11 labeled 4-oxo-quinoline structure, designated KD2, further structural optimizations were performed, which led to the discovery of N-(1-adamantyl)-1-(2-ethoxyethyl)-8-methoxy-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide (RS-016). Compared to KD2, RS-016 exhibits a higher binding affinity towards CB2 (K-i = 0.7 nM) with a selectivity over CB1 of >10,000 and lower lipophilicity (logD(7.4) = 2.78). [C-11]RS-016 was obtained in >= 99% radiochemical purity and up to 850 GBq/mu mol specific radioactivity at the end of synthesis. In vitro autoradiography on rodent spleen tissue showed high specific binding to CB2. [C-11]RS-016 was stable in vitro in rodent and human plasma over 40 min, whereas 47% intact compound was found in vivo in rat blood plasma 20 min post injection (p.i.). High specific binding to CB2 was observed in murine spleen tissues and postmortem ALS patient spinal cord tissues in vitro autoradiography, ex vivo biodistribution data confirmed the high and specific uptake of [C-11]RS-016 in spleen region in rats. In vivo specificity of [C-11]RS-016 could also be shown in brain by PET imaging using a murine neuroinflammation model, which has higher CB2 receptor expression level in the brain induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) application. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据