4.6 Article

Chemical Treatment of Waste Abaca for Natural Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Composite

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma10060579

关键词

waste utilization; abaca (Manila hemp) fiber; chemical treatment; fiber-reinforced composite; geopolymer; tensile strength; definitive screening design of experiment

资金

  1. National Research Council of the Philippines (NRCP) [P-015]
  2. Philippine Council for Industry, Energy and Emerging Technology Research and Development (PCIEERD)
  3. Advanced Device and Materials Testing Laboratory (ADMATEL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of natural fibers in reinforced composites to produce eco-friendly materials is gaining more attention due to their attractive features such as low cost, low density and good mechanical properties, among others. This work thus investigates the potential of waste abaca (Manila hemp) fiber as reinforcing agent in an inorganic aluminosilicate material known as geopolymer. In this study, the waste fibers were subjected to different chemical treatments to modify the surface characteristics and to improve the adhesion with the fly ash-based geopolymer matrix. Definitive screening design of experiment was used to investigate the effect of successive chemical treatment of the fiber on its tensile strength considering the following factors: (1) NaOH pretreatment; (2) soaking time in aluminum salt solution; and (3) final pH of the slurry. The results show that the abaca fiber without alkali pretreatment, soaked for 12 h in Al-2(SO4)(3) solution and adjusted to pH 6 exhibited the highest tensile strength among the treated fibers. Test results confirmed that the chemical treatment removes the lignin, pectin and hemicellulose, as well as makes the surface rougher with the deposition of aluminum compounds. This improves the interfacial bonding between geopolymer matrix and the abaca fiber, while the geopolymer protects the treated fiber from thermal degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据