4.7 Article

SNP-SNP interactions between WNT4 and WNT5A were associated with obesity related traits in Han Chinese Population

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep43939

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371278, 31471188, 81573241, 31511140285, 31301029]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570819, 2016M602797]
  3. Natural Science Basic Research Program Shaanxi Province [2015JQ3089]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. National Institutes of Health [P50AR055081, R01AG026564, R01AR050496, R01AR057049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considering the biological roles of WNT4 and WNT5A involved in adipogenesis, we aimed to investigate whether SNPs in WNT4 and WNT5A contribute to obesity related traits in Han Chinese population. Targeted genomic sequence for WNT4 and WNT5A was determined in 100 Han Chinese subjects and tag SNPs were selected. Both single SNP and SNP x SNP interaction association analyses with body mass index (BMI) were evaluated in the 100 subjects and another independent sample of 1,627 Han Chinese subjects. Meta-analyses were performed and multiple testing corrections were carried out using the Bonferroni method. Consistent with the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits ( GIANT) dataset results, we didn't detect significant association signals in single SNP association analyses. However, the interaction between rs2072920 and rs11918967, was associated with BMI after multiple testing corrections (combined P = 2.20 x 10(-4)). The signal was also significant in each contributing data set. SNP rs2072920 is located in the 3'-UTR of WNT4 and SNP rs11918967 is located in the intron of WNT5A. Functional annotation results revealed that both SNPs might be involved in transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Our results suggest that a combined effect of SNPs via WNT4-WNT5A interaction may affect the variation of BMI in Han Chinese population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据