4.2 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined With Fluoropyrimidine Monotherapy for Unfit or Older Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 E61-E72

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.08.006

关键词

Chemotherapy; Elderly; First-line; Overall survival; Progression-free survival

类别

资金

  1. Roche S.p.A.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whether bevacizumab represents a feasible option for the first-line treatment of unfit and elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer remains controversial. The present meta-analysis included data from 782 patients and provides evidence for the clinical benefit yielded in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival by the addition of bevacizumab to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for these complex patients. Background: Whether bevacizumab represents a feasible option for the first-line treatment of unfit and elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety data of bevacizumab combined with first-line fluoropyrimidine mono-chemotherapy for these complex patients. Patients and Methods: A systematic search of the published data was conducted through May 31, 2016. The random-effects model was used to combine the effect estimates and the I-2 index to quantify the between-study heterogeneity unexplained by sampling error. Results: We included 3 randomized controlled trials, 4 single-arm phase II trials, and 1 prospective cohort study in the present meta-analysis (n = 782). The monochemotherapy administered was capecitabine in 531 patients (67.9%) and 5-fluorouracil in 251 (32.1%); 500 (63.9%) also received bevacizumab. The median age was 75 years, 441 patients (56.4%) were men, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 in 684 patients (87.7%). The combination with bevacizumab produced advantages in terms of both progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.64; P <.00001; I-2 = 0%) and overall survival (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03; I-2 = 0%). The pooled effect estimates of the randomized controlled trials have been previously reported. As expected, all-grade hypertension (27% vs. 4.9%), bleeding (24% vs. 6.4%), thromboembolic events (10% vs. 5%), and proteinuria (25.6% vs. 8.2%) were more frequent in the bevacizumab combination group. Conclusion: Adding bevacizumab to first-line fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in unfit and elderly patients with mCRC, with a manageable safety profile and no unexpected toxicities. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据