4.1 Article

Influence of Experiences and Perceptions Related to Breastfeeding One's First Child on Breastfeeding Initiation of Second Child

期刊

MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1288-1296

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2228-1

关键词

Breastfeeding; Multiparas; Response efficacy; Experiences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Multiparas tend to initiate breastfeeding less than primiparas. While mothers often repeat the feeding method used for their first child with their second child, the way in which experiences and maternal perceptions related to breastfeeding one's first child may influence breastfeeding initiation with a second child remain underexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate whether physiological or social experiences, and related psychological factors, reported at the end of breastfeeding one's first child influence breastfeeding initiation with a second child. Methods Data from 174 multiparas who participated in the Infant Feeding Practices Study II, breastfed their first child, and completed the Year 6 Follow Up were analyzed using exact logistic regression. Results Mothers who reported experiencing trouble with the first baby's suck or latch had lower odds of initiating breastfeeding (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.56) than those who did not report this experience, whereas mothers who agreed that breastfed children are less likely to become obese had greater odds of initiating breastfeeding with a second child (OR 11.49, 95% CI 1.56-513.18) than those who did not agree. Discussion Efforts to facilitate breastfeeding initiation among multiparas may consider mothers' previous experiences and beliefs associated with breastfeeding. Strategies to facilitate initiation may focus on addressing barriers mothers experienced while breastfeeding their first child and increasing awareness about how breastfeeding may prevent childhood obesity. Future research should explore how such approaches may impact breastfeeding outcomes with subsequent children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据