4.3 Article

Microfluidic gut-on-a-chip with three-dimensional villi structure

期刊

BIOMEDICAL MICRODEVICES
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-017-0179-y

关键词

Gut-on-a-chip; Organ-on-a-chip; Microfluidic; 3D cell culture

资金

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Republic of Korea [R0004073, 10, 050, 154]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2016R1C1B1009747]
  3. KFRI (Korea Food Research Institute) [E0121705]
  4. Hongik University Research Fund
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [R0004073] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1C1B1009747] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current in vitro gut models lack physiological relevance, and various approaches have been taken to improve current cell culture models. For example, mimicking the three-dimensional (3D) tissue structure or fluidic environment has been shown to improve the physiological function of gut cells. Here, we incorporated a collagen scaffold that mimics the human intestinal villi into a microfluidic device, thus providing cells with both 3D tissue structure and fluidic shear. We hypothesized that the combined effect of 3D structure and fluidic shear may provide cells with adequate stimulus to induce further differentiation and improve physiological relevance. The physiological function of our '3D gut chip' was assessed by measuring the absorptive permeability of the gut epithelium and activity of representative enzymes, as well as morphological evaluation. Our results suggest that the combination of fluidic stimulus and 3D structure induces further improvement in gut functions. Our work provides insight into the effect of different tissue environment on gut cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据