4.7 Article

Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of three different types of terpolymers

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 1147-1155

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6qm00267f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [2015R1A2A1A15055605, 2015M1A2A2057506, 2015R1D1A1A09056905, 20100020209]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A15055605] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three types of photoactive terpolymers (Random, Regular and Block) were synthesized by incorporating two electron-deficient moieties and one electron-rich moiety based on two parent donor polymers, poly[(2,5-bis(2-decyltetradecyloxy) phenylene)-alt-(5,6-difluoro-4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl) benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole)] (PPDT2FBT(DT)) and poly[(2,5-bis(2-decyltetradecyloxy) phenylene)-alt-(5,6-dicyano-4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl) benzo[c][1,2,5] thiadiazole)] (PPDT2CNBT). All three terpolymers showed broad light absorption in the range of 300-850 nm covering the absorption of two parent polymers. Their optical, electrochemical, morphological and photovoltaic properties were compared and investigated in detail. Power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 5.63, 4.45 and 3.13% were obtained for PPDT2FBT(DT)-random-PPDT2CNBT, PPDT2FBT(DT)-regular-PPDT2CNBT and PPDT2FBT(DT)-block-PPDT2CNBT based photovoltaic devices, respectively. Through intensive investigation on charge carrier mobility, photocurrent and light intensity dependence of J(SC), the random structure was proved to be the most effective molecular design in this series of terpolymers, showing weaker charge recombination and enhanced charge transport/extraction with well-distributed blend morphology. The fine modulation of different arrangements and compositions of the three monomers in a main chain is crucial for optimizing the terpolymeric structures as efficient photoactive materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据