4.7 Article

Automatic Categorization and Scoring of Solid, Part-Solid and Non-Solid Pulmonary Nodules in CT Images with Convolutional Neural Network

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08040-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61501305, 61301270, 61401473]
  2. Shenzhen Key Basic Research Project [JCYJ20150525092940982]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen University [2016089]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130185120014]
  5. 111 project [B14039]
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM007753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a computer-aided diagnosis system (CADx) for the automatic categorization of solid, part-solid and non-solid nodules in pulmonary computerized tomography images using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Provided with only a two-dimensional region of interest (ROI) surrounding each nodule, our CNN automatically reasons from image context to discover informative computational features. As a result, no image segmentation processing is needed for further analysis of nodule attenuation, allowing our system to avoid potential errors caused by inaccurate image processing. We implemented two computerized texture analysis schemes, classification and regression, to automatically categorize solid, part-solid and non-solid nodules in CT scans, with hierarchical features in each case learned directly by the CNN model. To show the effectiveness of our CNN-based CADx, an established method based on histogram analysis (HIST) was implemented for comparison. The experimental results show significant performance improvement by the CNN model over HIST in both classification and regression tasks, yielding nodule classification and rating performance concordant with those of practicing radiologists. Adoption of CNN-based CADx systems may reduce the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists and provide a quantitative reference for further nodule analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据