4.8 Article

Enhanced desalination performance of forward osmosis membranes based on reduced graphene oxide laminates coated with hydrophilic polydopamine

期刊

CARBON
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 293-300

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.005

关键词

Membrane; Forward osmosis; Reduced graphene oxide; Polydopamine; Hydrophilicity

资金

  1. Industrial Facilities & Infrastructure Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [16IFIP-B088091-03]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea grant - Korean Government [NRF-2013R1A1A2066114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forward osmosis (FO) processes have been recognized as a low energy required next-generation desalination technology, but the low performance of polymeric membranes remains a bottleneck in the practical application of FO. Graphene oxide (GO) membranes possess a huge potential as an alternative to polymeric membranes because of their facile fabrication procedure, ultra-thin thickness, controllable pore size, and outperformance of competing materials in terms of water transport rate; the low stability of GO laminates under water and their hydrophobic property (if GO laminates are reduced) remain as problems requiring solution prior to their practical implementation. To solve these problems, herein, the chemical reduction of GO laminates and a hydrophilic adhesive polydopamine (pDA) layer were applied. Reduced GO (rGO) laminates sustainably retained their compacted nanochannels (3.45 A) compared to pristine GO laminates, which increased the selectivity of hydrated ions. In addition, adding a pDA coating onto the rGO laminates improved the hydrophilicity of the rGO laminate surface, which accelerated the water absorption speed. As a result of these synergistic effects, pDA-coated rGO (pDA-rGO) membranes achieved an outstanding water flux of 36.6 L/m(2). h, with a reverse solute flux of 0.042 mol/m(2).h and a high salt rejection rate of 92.0% in FO. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据