4.5 Article

Influence of end effect on rock strength in true triaxial compression test

期刊

CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 862-880

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0393

关键词

true triaxial compression test; intermediate principal stress; rock strength; end effect; three-dimensional empirical failure criterion; numerical modeling

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Z015001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of the end effect on rock strength in true triaxial compression testing was studied using a numerical approach. The influence of the intermediate principal stress (sigma(2)) on rock strength was isolated by using the two-dimensional Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion that depends only on the major principal stress (sigma(1)) and minor principal stress (sigma(3)). Thus, any enhancement to the rock strength with the increase of sigma(2) can be attributed to the end effect. It was shown that the end effect can result in an apparent sigma(2) effect, as long as the coefficient of friction (mu) at the rock specimen-steel platen contacts is not zero and the specimen in the sigma(2) loading direction is squat. When the strengthening due to the increase of sigma(2) predicted by a theoretical failure criterion was added to the strengthening due to the end effect, the results were in good agreement with the observed sigma(2) effect from some previous laboratory tests, indicating that the observed sigma(2) effect in true triaxial compression testing could be partially influenced by the end effect, particularly when sigma(3) was low. It is suggested to decrease the end effect to a level where the apparent sigma(2) effect is very small so that the obtained test results are more meaningful to characterize the actual sigma(2) effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据