3.9 Article

Quality of Crowdsourced Data on Urban Morphology-The Human Influence Experiment (HUMINEX)

期刊

URBAN SCIENCE
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/urbansci1020015

关键词

Local Climate Zones (LCZs); urban climate; crowdsourcing; volunteered geographic information; classification; WUDAPT

资金

  1. Cluster of Excellence 'CliSAP', University of Hamburg through the German Science Foundation (DFG) [EXC177]
  2. EU FP7 funded ERC grant Crowdland [617754]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [617754] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1250232] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0847472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The World Urban Database and Access Portal Tools (WUDAPT) is a community initiative to collect worldwide data on urban form (i.e., morphology, materials) and function (i.e., use and metabolism). This is achieved through crowdsourcing, which we define here as the collection of data by a bounded crowd, composed of students. In this process, training data for the classification of urban structures into Local Climate Zones (LCZ) are obtained, which are, like most volunteered geographic information initiatives, of unknown quality. In this study, we investigated the quality of 94 crowdsourced training datasets for ten cities, generated by 119 students from six universities. The results showed large discrepancies and the resulting LCZ maps were mostly of poor to moderate quality. This was due to general difficulties in the human interpretation of the (urban) landscape and in the understanding of the LCZ scheme. However, the quality of the LCZ maps improved with the number of training data revisions. As evidence for the wisdom of the crowd, improvements of up to 20% in overall accuracy were found when multiple training datasets were used together to create a single LCZ map. This improvement was greatest for small training datasets, saturating at about ten to fifteen sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据