4.3 Article

Protein aggregation in Ehrlichia chaffeensis during infection of mammalian cells

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 364, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnx059

关键词

Ehrlichia chaffeensis; host-pathogen interaction; protein folding; protein aggregation; molecular chaperone; ClpB

资金

  1. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20 GM103418]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01 AI070908, R56 AI121366]
  3. Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases at Kansas State University
  4. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station [17-085-J]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ehrlichia chaffeensis is an obligatory intracellular pathogen transmitted through infected ticks to humans and other vertebrates. We investigated the extent of protein aggregation in E. chaffeensis during infection of canine macrophage cell line, DH82. We discovered that the size of the aggregated fraction of E. chaffeensis proteins increased during the first 48 h post infection. We also incubated the infected cells with guanidinium chloride (GuHCl), a known inhibitor of the protein-disaggregating molecular chaperone ClpB. Up to 0.5 mM GuHCl had no impact on the host cells, whereas the viability of the pathogen was reduced by similar to 60% in the presence of the inhibitor. Furthermore, we found that the size of the aggregated protein fraction in E. chaffeensis increased significantly in cultures supplemented with 0.5 mM GuHCl, which also resulted in the preferential accumulation of ClpB with the aggregated proteins. Altogether, our results suggest that an exposure of E. chaffeensis to the stressful environment of a host cell results in an increased aggregation of the pathogen's proteins, which is exacerbated upon inhibition of ClpB. Our studies establish a link between protein quality control and pathogen survival during infection of a host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据