4.7 Article

Exploring experimental and computational markers of cyclic peptides: Charting islands of permeability

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 202-213

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.049

关键词

Peptide; Cyclic peptide; Drug design; NMR; Amide temperature coefficients

资金

  1. ARC Linkage Grant [LP110200213]
  2. Pfizer
  3. Queensland Government Smart Futures Co-investment Grant
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Research Fellowship [546578]
  5. Australian Research Council [LP110200213] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An increasing number of macrocyclic peptides that cross biological membranes are being reported, suggesting that it might be possible to develop peptides into orally bioavailable therapeutics; however, current understanding of what makes macrocyclic peptides cell permeable is still limited. Here, we synthesized 62 cyclic hexapeptides and characterized their permeability using in vitro assays commonly used to predict in vivo absorption rates, i.e. the Caco-2 and PAMPA assays. We correlated permeability with experimentally measured parameters of peptide conformation obtained using rapid methods based on chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Based on these correlations, we propose a model describing the interplay between peptide permeability, lipophilicity and hydrogen bonding potential. Specifically, peptides with very high permeability have high lipophilicity and few solvent hydrogen bond interactions, whereas peptides with very low permeability have low lipophilicity or many solvent interactions. Our model is supported by molecular dynamics simulations of the cyclic peptides calculated in explicit solvent, providing a structural basis for the observed correlations. This prospective exploration into biomarkers of peptide permeability has the potential to unlock wider opportunities for development of peptides into drugs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据