4.8 Article

Synergistic effect of surface and bulk single-electron-trapped oxygen vacancy of TiO2 in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 300-307

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.025

关键词

Single-electron-trapped oxygen vacancy (SETOV); Surface oxygen vacancy; Nanotube titanic acid; CO2 photoreduction; Positron annihilation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21103042, 21471047, 21673066]
  2. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents [15HASTIT043]
  3. University of Henan Province [16IRT-STHN015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen vacancies play an important role in many photocatalytic reaction, and have attracted enormous attention from the scientists and engineers. The surface or bulk oxygen vacancies have a different function in the photo-reaction process. Herein, three different TiO2 nanoparticles possessing surface oxygen vacancies (SO) and/or bulk single-electron-trapped oxygen vacancy (SETOV) were fabricated by dehydration or reduction of different titania precursors. The three kinds of TiO2 nanoparticles were characterized systematically by XRD, TEM, Raman, XPS, ESR, TG, UV-vis DRS, and PL techniques. The photocatalytic reduction results of CO2 indicated that both the bulk SETOVs and surface oxygen vacancies contributed to the enhancement of the light absorption, while the surface vacancies facilitated to the separation of the photo-generated charge carriers, and on the contrast, the bulk SETOVs acted as the recombination center. The co-existence of the surface and bulk oxygen vacancies exhibited a synergistic effect to improve the photoreduction efficiency of CO2 to CH4. Through adjusting the ratio of the surface and bulk oxygen vacancies and analyzing the positron lifetime and relative intensity by positron annihilation, the photoreduction efficiency of CO2 improved with the increase of the ratio of surface oxygen vacancies to bulk SETOVs. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据