4.2 Article

Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura

期刊

CHROMOSOME RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 145-154

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-016-9549-1

关键词

in situ hybridization; chromosomal evolution; polytene chromosomes; Drosophila

资金

  1. Barcelona Subobscura Initiative (BSI)
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain [BFU2012-35168, BFU2014-63732]
  3. Comissio Interdepartamental de Recerca i Innovacio Tecnologica, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain [2014SGR-1055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The comparative analysis of genetic and physical maps as well as of whole genome sequences had revealed that in the Drosophila genus, most structural rearrangements occurred within chromosomal elements as a result of paracentric inversions. Genome sequence comparison would seem the best method to estimate rates of chromosomal evolution, but the high-quality reference genomes required for this endeavor are still scanty. Here, we have obtained dense physical maps for Muller elements A, C, and E of Drosophila subobscura, a species with an extensively studied rich and adaptive chromosomal polymorphism. These maps are based on 462 markers: 115, 236, and 111 markers for elements A, C, and E, respectively. The availability of these dense maps will facilitate genome assembly and will thus greatly contribute to obtaining a good reference genome, which is a required step for D. subobscura to attain the model species status. The comparative analysis of these physical maps and those obtained from the D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster genomes allowed us to infer the number of fixed inversions and chromosomal evolutionary rates for each pairwise comparison. For all three elements, rates inferred from the more closely related species were higher than those inferred from the more distantly related species, which together with results of relative-rate tests point to an acceleration in the D. subobscura lineage at least for elements A and E.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据