4.0 Article

BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN RELATION TO METABOLIC SYNDROME COMPONENTS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE 2

期刊

ACTA CLINICA CROATICA
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 58-63

出版社

SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIV HOSPITAL
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.01.09

关键词

Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Adiposity; Hyperinsulinism; Inflammation; Bone density; Menopause

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is associated with greater bone mineral density (BMD) due to obesity; although rapid bone loss observed over time could be explained by elevated chronic inflammation. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between central adiposity and hyperinsulinemia, as well as inflammation markers with vertebral and femoral BMD and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Femoral and vertebral BMD, osteocalcin, pyrilinks D, beta-CrossLaps (B-CTx), insulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) were measured in 114 postmenopausal female patients with diabetes type 2.The patients of similar age, HbAlc levels and diabetes duration were divided into 2 groups based on their body mass index (BMI) values: lower or equal to 27 kg/m(2) (31 patients) and higher than 27 kg/m2 (83 patients). Lower levels of osteocalcin (p=0.001), B-CTx (p=0.000007) and pyrilinks D (p=0.0365), and higher femoral BMD (p=0.00006), insulin level (p=0.0002), PAI-1 (p=0.00000) and CRP (p=0.002) were found in the overweight group. There were no significant differences in vertebral BMD and fibrinogen. Osteocalcin and B-CTx showed inverse correlation, and femoral BMD positive correlation with waist circumference, insulin level and PALL This suggests that abdominal obesity and hyperinsulinemia as components of the metabolic syndrome could increase femoral BMD by lowering bone rate. In addition, the only inflammation marker linked with femoral BMD was PAI-1, which is associated with increased mineralization of cortical bone in mouse models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据