4.6 Article

Nitrogen-doped carbon materials with cubic ordered mesostructure: low-temperature autoclaving synthesis for electrochemical supercapacitor and CO2 capture

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 21, 页码 12524-12533

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra26424g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302154, 51402160, 21573115]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [BS2013CL032, ZR2014EMQ011]
  3. SDUST Research Fund [2015YQJH101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen doped ordered mesoporous carbons (NOMCs) with a 3-D body-centered cubic pore structure with uniform pore size of 2.9-3.0 nm and high BET surface area of 583-847 m(2) g (-1) have been synthesized by means of a facile and efficient low-temperature autoclaving route under basic conditions, in which triblock copolymer F127 was used as the template, and resorcinol/hexamethylenetetramine as the carbon precursor. The effect of synthesis parameters including the autoclaving temperature and autoclaving treatment time was investigated in detail. It is found that NOMCs with cubic Im ($) over bar 3m structure can be produced at the autoclaving temperature of 60 degrees C and autoclaving treatment time of >= 2 d. Benefiting from the unique features of high surface area, nitrogen doping, uniform and uninterrupted mesopores and rich microporosity, these NOMCs for supercapacitors exhibit high capacitance of 193 F g (-1) 1 at 1.0 A g (-1), high rate capacity (90% capacitance retention at 10 A g (-1)) and good cycling stability (99.1% capacity retention after 1000 cycles at 1.0 A g (-1)) in 6 M KOH aqueous solution and good cycling stability with specific capacitance retention over 500 cycles. Moreover, the NOMCs also show excellent CO2 capture properties with a capacity of 4.7 and 3.5 mmol g (-1) at 0 and 25 degrees C, respectively. It is revealed that both textural and surface chemistry properties influenced the CO2 capture performance of the resultant NOMCs adsorbents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据