4.6 Article

Enhanced anti-stocks luminescence in LaNbO4:Ln3+ (Ln3+ = Yb3+, Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+) with abundant color

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 27, 页码 16777-16786

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra28592a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016EMM20, ZR2016EMQ09]
  2. Science and Technology Foundation of Shenzhen
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20160331173823401]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [51372138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lanthanide ion doped up-conversion luminescent (UCL) materials, which have the ability to convert nearinfrared longer wavelength excitation light into shorter wavelength visible light, have recently drawn much attention. Now, a series of Ln(3+) (Yb3+, Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+) ions doped LaNbO4 (LNO) materials were prepared through a two-step route, including a facile sol-gel process and subsequent combustion. In our work, thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), up-conversion luminescence (UCL), energy level diagram, luminescent lifetimes and corresponding CIE were utilized to characterize the properties. A 980 nm laser was employed to excite Yb3+ ions to achieve the F-2(7/2) -> F-2(5/2) transition, and the LNO: Yb3+, Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ samples exhibited intense green, yellowish-green and blue emission, respectively. Luminescent spectra at different powers demonstrated the two-photon absorption process; meanwhile, the corresponding energy transfer mechanisms from Yb3+ to Ln(3+) and the emissions of Ln(3+) under 980 nm laser excitation were described via an energy level diagram. Moreover, multicolor UCL emissions, the optimal intensities and corresponding mechanism were systematically explored via a suite of concentration spectra of different Ln(3+) ions. At last, the decay lifetimes based on the concentration variation of Yb3+ ion demonstrated that the lifetimes are heavily influenced by Yb3+ ion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据