4.6 Article

Facile preparation of Ag/Ni(OH)2 composites with enhanced catalytic activity for reduction of 4-nitrophenol

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 14283-14289

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra27153g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939705]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST:2014TS022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a facile and environmentally friendly process was developed for synthesis of Ag/Ni(OH)(2) composites by only mixing an ethanol solution of AgNO3 with Ni(OH)(2) at room temperature. The morphology and structure of the as-prepared Ag/Ni(OH)(2) composites were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high resolution TEM (HRTEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that the composites consist of ultrathin nickel hydroxide and silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), the Ag NPs with an average diameter of around 4.7 nm evenly dispersed on the surface of Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets. The catalytic properties of the obtained Ag/Ni(OH)(2) composites were evaluated by the reduction of 4-nitrophenol(4-NP) using NaBH4 as a reducing agent. The results revealed that the obtained Ag/Ni(OH)(2) composites exhibited an outstanding catalytic activity. In addition, the formation mechanism of Ag NPs was probed by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis). It was found that Ni(OH)(2) as a substrate played an important role in the formation of silver particles, which not only acted as a superior adsorbent of silver ion but also a source of OH- that was able to accelerate the reaction. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and fluorescence (FL) spectra were employed to indirectly elucidate the mechanism for reduction of 4-NP. The Ag/Ni(OH)(2) composites are very promising catalytic candidates for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol because of their easy and simple preparation route and high catalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据