4.6 Article

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1-(2-(adamantane-1-yl)-1H-indol-5-yl)-3-substituted urea/thiourea derivatives as anticancer agents

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 81, 页码 51640-51651

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra08149a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773600, 81302652, 31471273, 41376172, 31461163002]
  2. Project of South Center for Marine Research [14GYY023NF23]
  3. Fujian Science and Technology project [2014N5012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The indole ring, adamantane, and urea groups are important components of bioactive molecules. The orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 as a unique transcription factor encoded by an immediate early gene is a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. We synthesized a series of 1-(2-(adamantane-1-yl)1H- indol-5-yl)-3-substituted urea/thiourea derivatives and identified which of these potential anticancer candidates could modulate the expression and activity of Nur77. The synthesized compounds were initially evaluated for their anti-proliferative activity against H460 lung cancer cells, HepG2 liver cancer cells, and MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Major compounds were found to be active against these tested cancer cell lines. The compounds with IC50 values down to 20 mu M exhibited selective cytotoxicity effects on the human lung cancer cell line (H460) and the normal lung cell line (MCR-5). Compounds 7n, 7s, and 7w induced Nur77-expression in a time-and dose-dependent manner in H460 cells. Compounds 7n and 7s strongly induced Parp cleavage in H460 cells, but 7w resulted in a slight induction of apoptosis. The apoptotic effect of 7s was largely inhibited when the Nur77 was knocked down by shRNA. This indicated that Nur77 served as a critical mediator for the anticancer action of 7s. The molecular docking study between Nur77 and 7s revealed that compound 7s exhibited a promising binding affinity with Nur77. These findings will provide a direction for the developing Nur77 regulator as anticancer agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据