4.6 Article

Influence of removing PMMA residues on surface of CVD graphene using a contact-mode atomic force microscope

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 6943-6949

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra27436f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2010-0020207]
  2. Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korean government's Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy [20164030201340]
  3. industrial research innovation program [10051701]
  4. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0020207, 22A20130012822, 2013R1A1A1A05005298] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For device fabrication based on 2D materials such as graphene, hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is conventionally used in the wet transfer and lithography processes. All these processes are sources of polymer residue, which degrade the intrinsic electrical and optical properties of devices. In this work, we report the effect of mechanical cleaning via contact mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) on the surface morphology and electrical behavior of chemical-vapor-deposition grown graphene. An AFM tip with large contact force was used to scan, and multiple scanning was performed to remove the residues of PMMA. Raman mapping was incorporated to confirm the cleaning effect using AFM. Transconductance properties associated with a field-effecttransistor device based on the cleaned graphene were analyzed. It was observed that charge-neutrality point was shifted towards zero gate voltage and the charge carrier mobility was increased. We claim that our technique provides a facile route to fabricate devices with less polymer residue and higher efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据