4.6 Article

Designing multifunctional SO3H-based polyoxometalate catalysts for oxidative desulfurization in acid deep eutectic solvents

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 87, 页码 55318-55325

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra10125b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506080, 21576122, 21646001]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150485]
  3. Advanced Talents of Jiangsu University [15JDG053]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are 'green' sustainable solvents with wide applications such as extractive desulfurization of fuel; however, their low extraction efficiency is a major limitation to such applications. In this work, several SO3H-functionalized polyoxometalates were prepared and applied to oxidative desulfurization of fuels with acidic DESs as extractants and 30 wt% of H2O2 as an oxidant. Compared with neutral POM catalysts, acidic catalysts, such as [PSTEtA]3PW(12)O(40), exhibited higher catalytic performance with 100% desulfurization efficiency. However, in the absence of DESs sulfur removal was only 9.6% with [PSTEtA](3)PW12O40 used as a catalyst. To study the role of the DESs, three types of DESs were evaluated on extraction and oxidation of dibenzothiophene (DBT), with acidic DES ChCl/2Ac exhibiting the best performance. The effects of different reaction conditions, such as the amount of H2O2 and ChCl/2Ac, reaction temperature and time, different sulfur compounds, and fuel composition, were investigated. Combined with the kinetic study, results suggested that oxidation of DBT was attributed to a pseudo-first-order kinetic reaction. The activities of different sulfur compounds decreased in the order of DBT > 3-methylbenzothiophene (3-MBT) > 4-methyldibenzothiophene (4-MDBT) > 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT) > benzothiophene (BT). Compared with aromatics, the sulfur removal could be strongly affected by olefins, showing a drop of up to 66.6%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据