4.8 Article

Efficient Red Perovskite Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Solution-Processed Multiple Quantum Wells

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606600

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China-Fundamental Studies of Perovskite Solar Cells [2015CB932200]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20131413, BK20140952, BK20150043, BK20161008]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11474164, 61405091]
  4. Joint Research Program China [2016YFE0112000]
  5. European Union [2016YFE0112000]
  6. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor program
  7. Synergetic Innovation Center for Organic Electronics and Information Displays

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a facile and scalable process to achieve high performance red perovskite light-emitting diodes (LEDs) by introducing inorganic Cs into multiple quantum well (MQW) perovskites. The MQW structure facilitates the formation of cubic CsPbI3 perovskites at low temperature, enabling the Cs-based QWs to provide pure and stable red electroluminescence. The versatile synthesis of MQW perovskites provides freedom to control the crystallinity and morphology of the emission layer. It is demonstrated that the inclusion of chloride can further improve the crystallization and consequently the optical properties of the Cs-based MQW perovskites, inducing a low turn-on voltage of 2.0 V, a maximum external quantum efficiency of 3.7%, a luminance of approximate to 440 cd m(-2) at 4.0 V. These results suggest that the Cs-based MQW LED is among the best performing red perovskite LEDs. Moreover, the LED device demonstrates a record lifetime of over 5 h under a constant current density of 10 mA cm(-2). This work suggests that the MQW perovskites is a promising platform for achieving high performance visible-range electroluminescence emission through high-throughput processing methods, which is attractive for low-cost lighting and display applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据