4.6 Article

Solvent-dependent and highly selective anion sensing and molecular logic application of bisindolylmaleimide derivatives

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 20, 页码 12161-12169

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra28367e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21374017, 21401023, 21574021]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20123503120002]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology in Fujian Province University (IRTSTFJ)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2013H0018]
  5. Educational Commission of Fujian Province [JA12059, JA14068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of bisindolylmaleimide dyes (IMs) with different N-substituents (IM-PFB, IM-TBA and IM-MB) and planarity (IMC-MB and IM-MB) were designed and synthesized to detect anions selectively and sensitively. The anion-sensing properties were investigated systematically by changing the N-substituents of maleimide, solvent type and molecular planarity. Results indicate that the anion recognition is significantly affected by the solvent type rather than the N-substituents. Different anion sensitivity in various solvents makes IMs selectively detect F- in ACN, H2PO4- in DCM and CN- in THF. Due to the fixed location of two NH groups, the dye IMC-MB with planar structure exhibits poor sensing selectivity in various solvents. The titration curves of anions show that the sensing mechanism of IMs in various solvents for anions is different. The further experimental and DFT/TDDFT calculation results demonstrate that the hydrogen bond interaction and deprotonation of one H atom take place in DCM and THF, respectively, and that the two interactions synchronously exist in ACN. Interestingly, the solvent-dependent anion recognition can make IM-PFB mimic the function of three kinds of decoders (1-to-2, 2-to-3 and 2-to-4), a 4-to-2 encoder and a 1 : 2 demultiplexer. It is really rare for one molecule to mimic so many logic operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据