4.6 Article

Influence of melt-draw ratio on the crystalline behaviour of a polylactic acid cast film with a chi structure

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 63, 页码 39914-39921

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra05422j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51603047]
  2. Guangdong Province Major Key Projects of Applied Research and Development of Science and Technology [2015B090925021]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project [201510010037]
  4. Guangdong Province Ordinary University Innovation Project
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2016A030310344]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592461]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, polylactic acid cast films were prepared with different melt-draw ratios via an extrusion casting process. The structure and properties of the prepared films were characterized. The results showed that with the increasing melt-draw ratios (MDRs), an oriented structure appeared at first, and then, a chi structure crystal was formed at higher MDRs. The vertical shish crystals showed a higher melting point than the oriented structure. The PLA molecules were extended by melt-stretching, and weak hydrogen bonds appeared between the carbonyl and methyl bond in the neighbourhood extended PLA molecular chain segments. The hydrogen bond limited the molecular mobility in the amorphous region, which increased the weight fraction of the rigid amorphous region. The stretching-induced crystallization occurred during the melt-stretching process, but the formed crystals were not strictly alpha form or alpha' form. At lower MDRs, mainly an oriented structure was formed, and with the increase in MDR, meridional streaks in SAXS patterns appeared, accompanying the shish formation. The kebab and oriented structure signals superimposed together; this led to irregular equatorial scattering patterns. In this study, we provide a new insight into PLA crystallization via melt-extrusion cast flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据