4.6 Article

Self-testing of binary observables based on commutation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.062323

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action ROSETTA [749316]
  2. European Research Council [337603]
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research (Sapere Aude)
  4. Villum Fonden via QMATH Centre of Excellence [10059]
  5. Villum Fonden [00010059] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [749316] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [337603] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider the problem of certifying binary observables based on a Bell inequality violation alone, a task known as self-testing of measurements. We introduce a family of commutation-based measures, which encode all the distinct arrangements of two projective observables on a qubit. These quantities by construction take into account the usual limitations of self-testing and since they are weighted by the (reduced) state, they automatically deal with rank-deficient reduced density matrices. We show that these measures can be estimated from the observed Bell violation in several scenarios and the proofs rely only on standard linear algebra. The trade-offs turn out to be tight, and in particular, they give nontrivial statements for arbitrarily small violations. On the other extreme, observing the maximal violation allows us to deduce precisely the form of the observables, which immediately leads to a complete rigidity statement. In particular, we show that for all n >= 3 the n-partite Mermin-Ardehali-Belinskii-Klyshko inequality self-tests the n-partite Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state and maximally incompatible qubit measurements on every party. Our results imply that any pair of projective observables on a qubit can be certified in a truly robust manner. Finally, we show that commutation-based measures give a convenient way of expressing relations among more than two observables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据