4.7 Article

Effects of phosphorus slag powder and polyester fiber on performance characteristics of asphalt binders and resultant mixtures

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 289-295

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.141

关键词

Phosphorus slag powder; Polyester fiber; Rutting; Low temperature cracking; Moisture susceptibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51608046]
  2. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang'an University [310831171009, 310831171001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015T81000, 2015M582590]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) of the Ministry of Education, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of phosphorus slag powder (PSP) and polyester fiber (PF) on the rheological properties of asphalt binder and performance characteristics of resultant mixtures. It is also of great interest to determine whether the PSP can be used to replace conventional filler (i.e., limestone powder) without negatively affecting the mixture performance. A laboratory experiment was developed which included characterization of PSP and PF, determinations of the optimum content of PF and optimum PSP-binder ratio, and performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures with various combinations of PF, PSP and limestone powder. The PSP behaved effectively as a mineral filler such that it increased the binder viscosity resulting in enhanced mixture rutting resistance. The use of PF significantly improved the mixture resistance to low-temperature cracking and moisture damage as indicated by the flexural strain and tensile strength ratio results. Overall, mixture with 3% PF at the PSP-binder ratio of 1.0 outperformed the others with limestone powder and/or PF, indicating the feasibility of recycling PSP and PF into asphalt mixtures for satisfactory mixture performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据