4.8 Article

Immune Gene Expression Is Associated with Genomic Aberrations in Breast Cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 77, 期 12, 页码 3317-3324

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3478

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [MFGA 13428]
  3. Susan G. Komen Leadership Award
  4. H.W. & J. Hector-Stiftung, Mannheim [M67]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is a favorable prognostic factor in breast cancer, but what drives immune infiltration remains unknown. Here we examine if clonal heterogeneity, total mutation load, neoantigen load, copy number variations (CNV), gene- or pathway-level somatic mutations, or germline polymorphisms (SNP) are associated with immune metagene expression in breast cancer subtypes. Thirteen published immune metagenes correlated separately with genomic metrics in the three major breast cancer subtypes. We analyzed RNA-Seq, DNA copy number, mutation and germline SNP data of 627 ER+, 207 HER2(+), and 191 triple-negative (TNBC) cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons, and permutation testing was used to assess false discovery rates. Increased immune metagene expression associated significantly with lower clonal heterogeneity estimated by MATH score in all subtypes and with a trend for lower overall mutation, neoantigen, and CNV loads in TNBC and HER2(+) cancers. In ER+ cancers, mutation load, neoantigen load, and CNV load weakly but positively associated with immune infiltration, which reached significance for overall mutation load only. No highly recurrent single gene or pathway level mutations associated with immune infiltration. High immune gene expression and lower clonal heterogeneity in TNBC and HER2(+) cancers suggest an immune pruning effect and equilibrium between immune surveillance and clonal expansion. Thus, immune checkpoint inhibitors may tip the balance in favor of immune surveillance in these cancers. (C)2017 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据