4.7 Article

Hydraulic fracture conductivity: effects of rod-shaped proppant from lattice-Boltzmann simulations and lab tests

期刊

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 293-303

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.04.003

关键词

Flow; Porous medium; Granular pack; Permeability; Lattice-Boltzmann method; Conductivity test; Digital rock; Digital core; Digital fracture conductivity

资金

  1. Schlumberger

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of this study is to evaluate the conductivity of random close packings of non-spherical, rodshaped proppant particles under the closure stress using numerical simulation and lab tests, with application to the conductivity of hydraulic fractures created in subterranean formation to stimulate production from oil and gas reservoirs. Numerical simulations of a steady viscous flow through proppant packs are carried out using the lattice Boltzmann method for the Darcy flow regime. The particle packings were generated numerically using the sequential deposition method. The simulations are conducted for packings of spheres, ellipsoids, cylinders, and mixtures of spheres with cylinders at various volumetric concentrations. It is demonstrated that cylinders provide the highest permeability among the proppants studied. The dependence of the nondimensional permeability (scaled by the equivalent particle radius squared) on porosity obtained numerically is well approximated by the power-law function: K/R-v(2) = 0. 204 phi(4.58) in a wide range of porosity: 0.3 <= phi <= 0.7. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations are cross-verified against finite-volume simulations using Navier-Stokes equations for inertial flow regime. Correlations for the normalized beta-factor as a function of porosity and normalized permeability are presented as well. These formulae are in a good agreement with the experimental measurements (including packings of rod-shaped particles) and existing laboratory data, available in the porosity range 0.3 <= phi <= 0.5. Comparison with correlations by other authors is also given. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据