4.7 Article

Combination of Sitagliptin and Silymarin ameliorates liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in rats

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 98-107

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.02.010

关键词

Liver fibrosis; Carbon tetrachloride; Sitagliptin; Silymarin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver fibrosis is a common pathological condition that occurs in most conditions associated with chronic liver injury. Silymarin is a herbal product widely used for its hepatoprotective effect. Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4-I), is clinically used as an oral antidiabetic agent. This study was designed to investigate the effects of Sitagliptin, Silymarin, and their combination on established liver fibrosis in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) rat model. Male albino rats received intraperitoneal injections of CCl4 three times a week for 7 weeks, as well as daily oral treatments of Sitagliptin (100 mg/kg) or Silymarin (100 mg/kg) or their combination during the 7 weeks of intoxication. Hepatic fibrotic changes were evaluated by measuring hepatic enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT) and markers of fibrosis (transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1), tissue 4-hydroxyproline level, histopathological score), oxidative stress (MDA, GSH, and NOx levels), inflammation (interleukin-6) as well as markers of HSCs activation (alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) expression). The injected rats with CCl4 for 7 weeks resulted in a marked elevation of hepatic fibrotic changes and reduction of GSH level, while the combination therapy showed a significant decrease in the former one and a significant increase in the later. In conclusion, this study shows that the combination therapy is more beneficial than monotherapy in ameliorating liver fibrosis in rats. Our findings suggest that Sitagliptin alone or in combination with Silymarin may introduce a new strategy for treating liver fibrosis in humans. (c) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据