4.6 Article

The role of sp2/sp3 hybrid carbon regulation in the nonlinear optical properties of graphene oxide materials

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 84, 页码 53643-53652

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra10505c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61705063, 21203058, 61275117]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [QC2016013, B201308]
  3. Foundation of Educational Commission of Heilongjiang Province of China [12531579]
  4. Innovative Talents Program of Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology [Q20130202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rational regulation of localized sp(2)/sp(3) hybrid carbon structure in graphene oxide systems plays a very important role in developing advanced carbon-based hybrid materials. Here, we report a simple ethanol solvothermal method toward precise control of the growth of the sp(2) hybrid carbon configurations/clusters in the sp(3) carbon matrix so as to regulate the structure of electronic energy bands in the graphene oxide system. The results of morphology observation, XPS, solid-state C-13 MAS NMR, FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy proved that controllable generation of the sp(2) hybrid carbon configurations/clusters can be achieved based on an executive oxidation/reduction strategy. Upon excitation by a 532 nm laser with 4 ns pulses, the obtained reduced graphene oxide (160-rGO-6) with a large number of sp(2) hybrid carbon configurations displays greater nonlinear reverse saturable absorption response and a higher nonlinear absorption coefficient b of 560 cm GW(-1) than graphene oxide with different oxidation degree (GO-X, X = 6, 8, 10 and 12), and reduced graphene oxide with relatively few sp(2) hybrid carbon configuration ratios (Y-rGO-6, Y = 80, 100, 120, 140 and 180). The significantly enhanced nonlinear reverse saturable absorption of 160-rGO-6 is attributed to the two photon absorption and excited state absorption originating from the sp(2) hybrid carbon configuration system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据