4.4 Article

Development of an NRCS curve number global dataset using the latest geospatial remote sensing data for worldwide hydrologic applications

期刊

REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 528-536

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2017.1297544

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71461010701]
  2. China Meteorological Administration [2015LASW-A09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The United States Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Runoff Curve Number (CN) is the most widely used rainfall-runoff modeling method. The hydrologic soil group (HSG), land use/cover, hydrologic surface condition and antecedent moisture condition jointly determine the CN value. This study aims to update the previous global CN map using the recently available geospatial remote sensing data. Based on the conventional United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and National Engineering Handbook Section 4 (NEH-4) standard lookup tables, the newly derived CN map utilizes the latest Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land cover and the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) soil data to investigate the current flood potential of the global land surface. The results show that the new CN map outperforms the previous one in detecting China's flood event locations with an improvement in the ratio of the averaged CN value for flood events to the averaged CN value for the whole land area of China. The new CN map reveals the effects of land surface change on hydrological conditions in the 2000s. Based on the Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) data and the gaugecombined Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) product, global surface runoff (April 2015-March 2016, 0.1 degrees x0.1 degrees) is estimated with the new CN map. The currently derived global CN dataset can be used in multi-scale hydrological applications, such as rainfall-runoff modeling and flood hazard risk assessment across continents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据