4.3 Article

Formulation of bio-based epoxy foams from epoxidized cardanol and vegetable oil amine

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LIPID SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 117, 期 11, 页码 1893-1902

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201500232

关键词

Amine; Cardanol; Epoxy; Foam; Scanning electron microscopy

资金

  1. European Union through the European Social Fund within Cracow University of Technology development program - top quality teaching for the prospective Polish engineers
  2. University of the 21st century project [UDA-POKL.04.01.01-00-029/10-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article deals with the synthesis of new bio-based epoxy foams from the reaction between cardanol-derived epoxy compounds and vegetable oil-derived diamines. Cardanol is a natural alkylphenol obtained from Cashew Nut Shell Liquid (CNSL), an abundant non-edible by-product of the cashew nutshell industry. Curing of epoxy monomers proceeded by reaction with Priamine 1073 diamine. Poly(methylhydrogenosiloxane) was used as blowing agent in order to expand epoxy material. Bio-based epoxy foams were formulated with different amounts of blowing agent and were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, thermal analysis, and by measurement of their apparent density. The foams exhibited good thermal stability above 210 degrees C and glass transition temperatures around 20 degrees C. Obtained materials can be considered as promising low cost and environmentally friendly foams for structural applications. Practical applications: The reactant described in this article, i.e., epoxidized cardanol from CNSL, provides bio-based aromatic building blocks for further epoxy foam syntheses by reaction with vegetable oil-derived amine and blowing agent. The obtained rigid epoxy foams are partially bio-based and may be applied as shock, thermal and vibration insulation, and for the production of lightweight materials for the transportation industry such as aircraft-interior panels and crash pads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据