4.5 Article

Unexpected distribution of ν1 f7/2 strength in 49Ca

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064317

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0000979]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY1102511]
  4. European Research Council [307986 STRONGINT]
  5. BMBF [05P15RDFN1]
  6. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-88ER40387]
  7. United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/L005743/1]
  8. JSPS [26.04323]
  9. U.S. DOE Office of Science
  10. NSF [PHY11-02511]
  11. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  12. STFC [ST/P003885/1, ST/L005743/1, ST/P005314/1, ST/J000051/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P005314/1, ST/J000051/1, ST/L005743/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Division Of Physics
  15. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1565546] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The calcium isotopes have emerged as a critical testing ground for new microscopically derived shell-model interactions, and a great deal of experimental and theoretical focus has been directed toward this region. We investigate the relative spectroscopic strengths associated with 1 f(7/2) neutron hole states in Ca-47,Ca-49 following one-neutron knockout reactions from Ca-48,Ca-50. The observed reduction of strength populating the 7/2(1)(-) state in Ca-49, as compared to Ca-47, is inconsistent with shell-model calculations using both phenomenological interactions such as GXPF1, and interactions derived from microscopically based two-and three-nucleon forces. The result suggests a fragmentation of the l = 3 strength to higher-lying states as suggested by the microscopic calculations, but the observed magnitude of the reduction is not reproduced in any shell-model description.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据