4.8 Article

Macrofibers with High Mechanical Performance Based on Aligned Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 24, 页码 20330-20339

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b14650

关键词

bacterial cellulose (BC) nanofibers; wet spinning cross-linking orientation; mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273043, 51573024]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cellulose (BC) nanofibers represent an emerging class of highly crystalline bionanofibers with high intrinsic mechanical properties. The remarkable nanofibers with oriented structure and strong interfibrillar interactions can realize high-performance materials. In this study, we demonstrated that macrofibers based on aligned BC nanofibers could, be prepared by wet spinning and drawing procedures. The relationship between process conditions, structure, and mechanical properties of macro fibers were investigated. The obtained macrofibers exhibited Young's modulus of 16.4 GPa and tensile strength of 248.6 MPa under the optimum process conditions, in which nanofibers displayed a high degree of alignment. Furthermore, we enhanced the interfacial interactions between nanofibers and obtained better mechanical performance by multivalent ion cross-linking. After exchanging the monovalent Na+ by Fe3+, the dried macrofiber reached Young's modulus of 22.9 GPa and tensile strength of 357.5 MPa. Particularly, the resulting macrofibers still maintained good mechanical properties with Young's modulus of 15.9 GPa and tensile strength of 262.2 MPa in the wet condition. This research provided a good method to fabricate macrofibers from BC nanofibers with good properties by continuous wet-spinning process. These macrofibers can be easily functionalized and have promising potential applications in smart textiles, biosensor, and structural reinforcement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据