4.6 Article

The effect of fatty pancreas on serum glucose parameters in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 37-41

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.11.007

关键词

Fatty pancreas; Prediabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Glucose; Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Fatty pancreas (FP) is related to obesity, and may have some clinical implications on glucose metabolism. The frequency and importance of FP in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are not clear. This study aimed to investigate: the frequency of FP in patientswith NASH, and its effects on serum glucose parameters. Methods: FP was detected and graded by transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) in patients with biopsy-proven NASH and healthy controls. Body Mass Index and waist circumference were recorded, and serum lipids, fasting serum glucose, HbA1c, OGTT 2-h, insulin level, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and prediabetes rates were detected. Results: Eighty-four subjects with NASH and 35 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. There was no FP in 41 (48.8%) of the NASH patients according to the study criteria. Forty-three of the NASH patients and 5 of the controls had different grades of fat in their pancreas (51.2% vs. 14%, p = 0.001). The HbA1c and OGTT 2-h results were significantly higher in NASH patients with FP compared to those without FP (p = 0.003 and p = 0.018). The rates of both prediabetes and DM were also found to be significantly increased in NASH patients with FP (p = 0.004). The mean waist circumference was higher in patients with FP (p = 0.027). Grade of FP by USG showed no effect on study parameters in subgroup analysis. Conclusion: FP is common in patients with NASH and increases the rate of prediabetes and DM. The coexistence of both NASH and FP has a further impact on glucose metabolism and DM frequency. (C) 2014 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据