4.4 Article

Predicting risk factors for radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary or metastatic lung tumours

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 1073, 页码 -

出版社

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160508

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K10404] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate risk factors for radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) after hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung tumours. Methods: From May 2004 to January 2016, 66 patients with 71 primary or metastatic lung tumours were treated with SBRT; these 71 cases were retrospectively analyzed for RP. To explore the risk factors for RP, the following factors were investigated: age, sex, performance status, operability, number of treatments, respiratory gating, pulmonary emphysema, tumour location and subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD). Irradiated underlying lung volumes of more than 5Gy, 10Gy, 20Gy and 30Gy (Lung V-5, V-10, V-20 and V-30), mean lung dose and volumes of gross tumour volume (in cubic centimetre) and planning target volume were calculated for possible risk factors of RP. Results: The median follow-up period was 32 months. RP of Grade 2 or more, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.0, was detected in 6 (8.4%) of the 71 cases. Grade 5 RP was identified in two cases. Of the risk factors of RP, subclinical ILD was the only factor significantly associated with the occurrence of RP of Grade 2 or more(p < 0.001). Both cases with Grade 5 RP had ILD with a honeycombing image. Conclusion: Subclinical ILD was the only significant factor for Grade 2-5 RP. In addition, the cases with honeycombing had a high potential for fatality related to severe RP. Patients with subclinical ILD should be carefully monitored for the occurrence of severe RP after SBRT. Advances in knowledge: Hypofractionated SBRT for primary or metastatic lung tumours provides a high local control rate and safe treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据