4.7 Article

Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 136-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.077

关键词

Geopolymer; Concrete; Fly ash; Compressive strength; Sulfuric acid resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete blended with an additional calcium source is presented in this paper. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was added as additional calcium in the geopolymer system as fly ash replacement (0, 10, 20 & 30%). The specimens were exposed to 2% sulfuric acid solution up to the age of 365 days, and the deterioration was identified in terms of mass loss and compressive strength retained. Microstructural analysis; SEM, XRD, and EDS was also carried out. The results indicate that the inclusion of OPC (as fly ash replacement) improves the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete specimens significantly whereas it did not have a similar effect on its resistance to sulfuric acid. The increase in compressive strength for the unexposed geopolymer concrete specimens was due to the additional calcium hydrated products which co-existed with alumina-silicate polymer structures. On the other hand, for the specimens exposed to sulfuric acid for 365 days, the inclusion of OPC at 10% showed the maximum retained compressive strength of around 52% of the strength value achieved for unexposed specimens at the same age. However, OPC inclusion beyond 10% decreases the ability of geopolymer concrete specimens to retain compressive strength. Maximum deterioration was observed when fly ash was replaced by OPC at 30%. This was due to the formation of additional calcium sulfate which increased with the increase in calcium products in the mixture. Microstructural changes were also observed for the exposed specimens at 365 days and confirmed the presence of sulfur compounds as a major cause for the deterioration. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据