4.3 Review

The prognostic value of GLUT1 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 26, 页码 43356-43367

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17445

关键词

glucose transporter 1; prognostic marker; survival; cancer; glycolysis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2014A030310073]
  2. Guangdong Province Public interest research and capacity - building projects, China [2014A020212448]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province - Doctor Foundation [2014A030310073]
  4. Guangzhou Science and technology plan of scientific research projects, China [201510010286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased glycolysis is one of the hallmarks of cancer. The abnormal expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) was reported to be associated with resistance to current therapy and poor prognosis. Numerous studies have investigated the correlation between GLUT1 expression and prognosis in cancers, but the conclusions are still controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between GLUT1 and survival in human cancers. PubMed, Springer, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched carefully to identify eligible studies evaluating prognostic value of GLUT1 in cancers. Twenty-seven studies with 4079 patients were included in the present study. Our pooled results identified that increased expression of GLUT1 was associated with unfavorable overall survival (HR = 1.780, 95% CI = 1.574-.013, p < 0.001)) and poorer disease-free survival (HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.229-3.095, p = 0.003). Furthermore, overexpression of GLUT1 linked with poor differentiated tumors (RR = 1.380, 95% CI = 1.086-1.755, p = 0.009; I-2 = 72.0%, p < 0.001), positive lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.395, 95% CI = 1.082-1.799, p = 0.010; I-2 = 70.8%, p = 0.002) and larger tumor size (RR = 1.405, 95% CI = 1.231-1.603, p < 0.001; I-2 = 37.3%, p = 0.093). This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that the GLUT1 may serve as an ideal prognostic biomarker in various cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据