4.3 Article

TUSC3 induces autophagy in human non-small cell lung cancer cells through Wnt/β-catenin signaling

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 32, 页码 52960-52974

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17674

关键词

non-small cell lung cancer; A549 cells; tumor suppressor candidate 3; Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway; autophagy

资金

  1. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61232001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of tumor suppressor candidate 3 (TUSC3) on autophagy in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. A total of 118 NSCLC patients (88 males and 30 females) who underwent surgery at our institute were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that TUSC3 protein expression was lower in NSCLC specimens than adjacent normal tissue. Correspondingly, there was greater methylation of TUSC3 in NSCLC than adjacent normal tissue. After transient transfection of A549 NSCLC cells with constructs designed to up-regulate or down-regulate TUSC3 expression, we analyzed the effects of inhibiting the Wnt pathway (XAV939) and autophagy (chloroquine, CQ) on the behavior of NSCLC cells. We also performed TOP/FOP-Flash reporter assays, MTT assays, Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide staining, and acridine orange staining to evaluate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy, respectively. Expression of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway components and autophagy-related proteins was analyzed using qRT-PCR and Western blotting. We found that TUSC3 inhibited cell proliferation and promoted both apoptosis and autophagy in A549 cells. In addition, TUSC3 increased expression of autophagy-related proteins. It also increased expression of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway components and promoted nuclear transfer of beta-catenin, resulting in activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. TUSC3 thus induces autophagy in human NSCLC cells through activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据